No Comments

The Confusions of Australians

Adam gets it wrong once again. I like Adam, I consider him a friend and he certainly has behaved like one. However, one must remember, he is still an Australian, and as such from faulty genetic stock. Particularly when it comes to things like, well, you know… following the law!

On his thoughts on Vigano he goes on to say that he does not dismiss the man, despite Vigano’s cowardly silence on Vatican II and his still not having specifically called out all the fake Popes since 1958 as fake Popes for over 50 years, and he says this is because:

If I were to do that then I should also dismiss the apostle Paul, who actively persecuted Christians until his meeting with Christ on the road to Damascus. And if Paul then many others also over the vast pages of human history.

No Adam. No, no, no, no!

Paul was NOT a Catholic when he was persecuting Christians. He was a Jew. You can call him a heathen if you prefer, even a Pagan. But the whole point is he was NOT a Catholic, nor pretending to be one.

So, when he repented and became one, whatever sins he had, including presumably multiple counts of murder, the one thing he could not be accused of is heresy.

The difference is Vigano absolutely is a heretic. And has been and acted like one in absolutely full knowledge of the fact.

While this does not forbid him from genuine repentance, and thus, eventual entry into heaven, it absolutely does prevent him from ever again having any legitimate clerical authority over absolutely anyone. And that, is not only logical, but divine law as far as the Church is concerned.

Might God still use him to in some way partially, or even totally to (eventually) reclaim the Catholic Church back from the pedophile infested, homosexual orgy indulging impostors currently squatting in the Vatican? Sure. God certainly loves to use broken tools.

But does it change the fact that Vigano, in the very best of cases, by dogmatic rule of Canon Law can only aspire to a lifetime of penance with authority over no one? No. It does not.

And this sort of “charitable” wishy-washy, mealy-mouthed, trying to see the best in people nonsense is how a freemasonic scum like Roncalli and a demonic infested Montini almost succeeded in destroying the Catholic Church, and certainly dealt it one of the worst blows of its 2000 year history.

So, no. Correct yourself friend.

Sure, the Vigano situation can be used to the advantage of the Church and it should be, but let us not let heretics avoid their just punishments.

Of course, I don’t begrudge Adam his sentiments or his prayers, which are all entirely appropriate, but let us not confuse what a heretic is nor what an ex-heretic may do or not do.

Lastly, it is also a logical flaw to expect that the only way the Church can heal is by the actions of the perverts, cowards and satanists within its buildings currently pretending to be Catholic. One might as well say the Satanic pedophiles in charge of the deep state are the only hope we have for eventually getting a good government.

    Leave a Reply

    All content of this web-site is copyrighted by G. Filotto 2009 to present day.
    Website maintained by mindseed design