I say you need to form communities that can survive and thrive without any link or need to or for FIAT money. It’s all vapourware. Always was. Yes it’s vapourware that can kill you or get you huge assets, but it’s vapourware all the same. And it can only control you while you rely on it.
Join us in about an hour and a half from now, at 9pm Rome Italy time. Whatever that is where you are.
Andrew Wilson is one of the most prominent political commentators on the internet. His own site The Crucible is I think referred to as the bloodsport of the internet in terms of logical arguments.
Andrew is a regular guest on the Whatever podcast, where he inevitably intellectually curb stomps a bunch of thots for entertainment purposes and, one hopes, trying to raise the general tone of degeneracy from the very bottom of the sewer to maybe floating atop it.
He is also an Eastern Orthodox and refers to his Christian Ethics often as the baseline foundation for his argument.
He is a very decent debater, and one of the very few people on the internet that argues correctly and intellectually honestly, so basically he’s like a species of internet denizen that is as rare as a living example of a T-Rex.
Despite this, he did make a truly moronic statement in a clip of a podcast I saw, where he claimed that “The Catholic Church agrees with us [The Eastern Orthodox] but we don’t agre with them.”
Prompted by this absolutely false assertion, I went on one of his livestreams and gave him a superchat to ask if he was willing to argue Sedevacantist Catholicism vs. Eastern Orthodoxy.
His response was a long and drawn out “Nooooo!” And I think he assumed I was your garden variety monomaniac autist that would be about as entertaining to argue with as watching paint dry.
And in fairness, argument of theological minutiae, are not too often very interesting, although, the videos were I bury Jay Dyer under his own lies are some of the most popular, so, what do I know.
At any rate, my contention here is that officially, Andrew Wilson ran away from the potential debate like scared little girl.
I did a stream where I mentioned this here. I mention this from about 4 minutes in.
But then, this super-chat of mine obviously weighing heavily on his corrupt, schismatic conscience, he had a feudal slip. That’s not a typo. The feud between the schismatics of the East and the pure, true and good Catholics of the West has been ongoing for nearly a thousand years. You know, except when they periodically agree with us, like at the concil of Florence Andrew, remember that one, where you guys all agreed WE were right? Officially? yeah!
But then, as is typical of the Orthobros, they turn around and backstab, renege and basically go back on their word.
Anyway, on that stream of mine a guy left a comment:
I’ve never heard of any censure from any valid priest against lay-people expressing and defending their Church’s validity to schismatic, but I suppose it’s normal for the schismatics to want to avoid truth-tellers like roaches scatter from sunlight.
And there is more disturbing news that makes me wonder if elbrad02 is not really Andrew in a sock-puppet costume trying to give further reasons to avoid the truth, and it is this:
If this is true, and I have no reason to doubt it, because I know chadbh, then this post has just gone from 80% trolling in good nature to 50% trolling and the 30% drop in respect is if he really is friends with a demonstrable liar, quote-miner, deceiver, and fraud as Vajay Drier is.
I mean, look, don’t get me wrong, I have been friends with actual criminals, I have known the odd murderer or prostitute, and so on, but pathological liars… no. I can’t stand that shit.
In fairness I think Andrew himself is probably mostly or even almost wholly honest, so I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Anyway, that’s the tag line: Andrew Wilson cowardly runs away from debate with Sedevacantist Kurgan.
Weak, very weak.
And we all know why, including him:
And I know, I know, he’s say he misspoke, and this is all just a cynical ploy to raise my audience, and so on, and sure, it would be nice if I got a bunch more subscribers since the shadowbanning has been in effect for a long time I think, but none of that is an actual argument against the position I hold that Catholicism is the only Christianity, now, is it, Andrew?
No, no, it isn’t.
And Feudian slips are still indicators of the truth, Andrew. You know it, I know it, we all know it.
Some time back, I explained to my eldest the saying “All roads lead to Rome”.
Explaining it had a double meaning, firstly because the Romans were the ones who first build proper roads, in fact, several of them are still in use today millennia later, and secondly, because any version of Churchianity one cares to investigate, if one is honest, inevitably, leads back to Catholicism, which until 1958 and a period of a few decades some centuries ago, has always had its main headquarters in Rome.
In essence, the only true Church has always been Catholicism, and this is partly also why Rome has been thought of as both the Eternal City and the Omphalus of the World (belly button for you ‘muricans and GenZs).
This was several weeks ago.
A little while back, I was driving somewhere with her and had forgot the phone at home, so we decided to wing it and try and figure out how to get to where we were going by rough geographical orientation.
At one point, turning into a road, I said rhetorically to myself:
“Who knows where this road goes?”
Scorpio Girl: “Ask the Romans.”
follow: RSS
The Kardashians for Men
It’s the Whatever Podcast. They get enough hits I don’t need to link to it.
I have a shameful confession to make: I have now watched probably 5 or 6 hours total of that show, basically pieces of shows, and some shorts and all I can say is that not a single second of it was in any way educational or meaningful.
Not a single novel idea or perspective that I didn’t already have, or rejected, has in any way changed or shifted at all.
All that happened is that I was somewhat entertained by how Andrew Wilson generally manages to not have his brain leak out his ears as he patiently walks feminists through the most basic steps of nursery level logic.
The only other thing that I learnt is that the show’s host is rather bitter and I am willing to bet not very successful (by his own metric certainly) in his dating life.
Oh, and I suppose my contempt for humanity in general, has mildly increased as a result of the absolute theft of oxygen so many of the women on the podcast are committing on a second by second basis.
In order to save a few trillion of your brain cells from undergoing the irreversible demise I subjected mine to for the sake of science, allow me to make an incomplete list here-below, of women you must simply immediately turn around from and walk away. Do not say anything, do not engage, and never contact them again (and doubly so if you live in the USA) if they say ANY of the following:
* I’m a feminist
* We live in a patriarchy (and that is a negative thing)
* The patriarchy oppresses women
* I don’t want children
* I am pro-choice
* I am not religious
* Cannot answer the question “What is a woman?” In one or two extremely direct and simple sentences, such as: An adult female human.
And in fact, unless they are a proper Catholic, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to marry a woman. Literally none.
The ONLY marriage that is valid is the one between a man and a woman that both parties agree is indissoluble until death.
Specifically, in order to make this as simple and direct as possible, let’s be clear that the ONLY religion that does NOT permit divorce is Catholicism, and even then, we are talking ONLY about real Catholicism, which today is found only among Catholics known as Sedevacantist.
And the MAIN purpose of marriage (though not the only one) is to make and raise children, therefore, unless the prospective husband or wife is a practicing and believer of Sedevacantist Catholicism, there is no reason whatsoever that you ever need to enter into some fake, diluted, dissoluble, travesty of “marriage” that will also open most men up to divorce and all its attendant damage.
If men simply and clearly adopted this stance, along with the really quite simple and authorative belief in the only Christianity that ever existed legitimately, all of the West’s problems would be resolved.
It really is that simple. And would take no more than a few years to change the zeitgeist of the entire West. If only 20% of men became Sedes in the USA, today, within 5 years the entire country would be rid of almost all nonsensical wokeness.
Because truth, inevitably wins.
No related posts.
By G | 4 October 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary