Simplicius does the work I am too lazy (and bored by the subject) to do in terms of explaining in detailed steps what exactly is going on at the front lines of WWIII that we have been in since early 2020 when the biological, genetic, and psychological attack on much of humanity was started by the Satanic Pedophiles that run most of this planet. His post on the (more) recent attempts by the gay cocaine dwarf to create a nuclear incident is rather detailed and informative, and takes you through the whole things well.
The likelihood of some kind of nuclear incident soon at one of the two nuclear plants is definitely raised to “probable” in my mind, due to the fact that they have a lot of embedded foreign media types now reporting (totally illegal, by the way) from the area of Russia that the Ukis have managed to push into.
Here is a small part of his post:
Right now, the information campaign being coordinated in parallel with the Kursk offensive is reaching a deafening fever pitch. NATO and its vast intel machinery are working overtime to push the narrative that the Kursk campaign is ‘overwhelming’ Putin and Russia, that internal fissures are threatening to swallow Putin’s ‘regime’ whole, and that things are generally collapsing for Russia. Even the latest Western articles are switching to this last blind shot in the dark to give Ukraine a chance:
The latest push includes all kinds of provocations, such as foreign journalists—from UK and Italy—embedded with the AFU, illegally entering sovereign Russian territory to report from it.
Here’s British CNN correspondent illegally entering Russian territory:
This includes infamous American mercenary outfit ‘Forward Observation Group’ flaunting the fact they too are allegedly in Kursk:
This is a timed and calculated provocation, meant to push Russia to the brink, hitting every conceivable pressure point of outrage, stoking ancestral Russian pride and patriotism. And it’s true, the invasion is a black eye on Russia, to an extent—but it must be considered within the grander overall scope of the situation: things feel terminal for Ukraine; Zelensky is accelerating as if propelled by some unprecedentedly urgent impetus. By his own actions, he’s demonstrating that Ukraine appears to be on the brink, and the West is giving its all in what may amount to be one final heroic propaganda provocation to try to stir Russia out of its comfort zone.
We can see the two-pronged urgency emerge from the dire situation on Ukraine’s eastern flank in Donbass, as the collapse continues to accelerate there.
Do read the whole thing, especially if you are still somewhat prone to reading Western Newspapers or watching Western News Channels, or caring about Western pretend voting charades and so on.
If however you want the unfiltered Kurgan summary, here it is:
It’s all kabuki as usual. The Ukis, pushed by the (((US-Bankers))) led NATO puppets, managed to get a foothold in Russia somewhat near a second Russian Power Station in the Kursk region, (the first one now being in “new” Russian territory if I recall right). The idea is to either:
Promote Russian willingness to come to the negotiating table, which is totally retarded, because Putin has already made it clear there will be no negotiations with people who are agreement incapable, so any “negotiations” will be limited to Putin saying: “Do this.” And the Ukis and combined Clown World saying “Yes sir, thank you sir.”
The other alternative is to try and provoke Russia into a nuclear event response. What I mean by this is that the Bankers running the USA like their bitch, and the USA running most of Western Europe like their poodles, will try to cause some kind of nuclear-like attack on Russia. I mean by this, the destruction of one or both of the nuclear plants, a dirty “tactical” nuke or two in the area or something similar. Prodded to this extent, Russia will have no real alternative but to respond in some fashion. What that response would be is hard to say, but keep in mind that apparently UK spies from MI6 and the usual American mercenaries and CIA types are all helping with he attacks on the power stations. And this is being confirmed by Russia but pretty much by the fact that countries like the UK and Italy already have embedded presstitutes in the forward operations of the Ukis (with my deepest apologies to crack-whores, street-walkers, and prostitutes who are a far more honest, dignified, and honourable lot than your average Wester journalist).
If the Clown Worlder Pedovampires manage to push Putin to a nuclear response, the gloves are pretty much off and Europe is likely to become a literal wasteland, complete with mutants, radioactive craters, and a scorched Earth, to one degree or other. This is the hoped for response by the Satanists. I know its hard to believe, but you really need to educate yourself about what Freemasons are, what they believe, who they are serving, and what their ultimate master-plan, as laid out in quite some detail by their guru Albert Pike is. It literally is the bringing of Hell on Earth to satisfy their master Lucifer and bring on what they see the new era of “enlightenment”. Which is one of their pet phrases, along with “equality, brotherhood of man, and freedom”, yes, the egalitè fraternitè and libertè of the French revolutions, which murdered Catholics by the tens of thousands, including torturing babies, bankrupted the French government and blamed it on Luis and Marie Antoniette, who lost their heads on it, and the money was used to fund the American revolution that created the first Freemason country in the world, the USA. Which is why all manner of degeneracy, filth and absolute inhuman crap spews forth from there.
Programs like Jerry Springer, in the early 1990s were unknown in the rest of the world, and the first time my brother and I saw them we were flabbergasted at what a cesspool of total degeneracy America was. We called those shows “Why did you fuck my uncle’s dog.” because in essence, that is what they were. And most of that stuff is pushed by the people who run Hollywood and many of the media there, which, Cohen-cidentally, also happen to mostly be Jews, who also Cohen-cidentally, if you listen to their Rabbis and read their Talmud, tell you quite clearly that the Judaic religion worships the ruler of this world, that is, Satan, not God the Father.
This is not hyperbole. You really should investigate the matter yourself if you don’t believe me. Please go ahead and prove me wrong.
Now, as to whether they will succeed or not in making Europe the hard battleground for WWIII, I think it’s always possible, but somewhat unlikely.
First of all, even the puppets of the “Americans” running America and by extension Europe, are starting to realise that if it does devolve to Nuclear War, they too will get fried. But more importantly, the average European citizen has absolutely no wish whatsoever of even entering a conventional war with Russia. Never mind a nuclear one.
The Clown Worlders in Europe are banking on Putin’s decency, which is to say, that they think even if they produce a dirty nuke bomb somewhere in Russia (that is not say Moscow, or St. Petersburg) Putin will be too humane and polite to nuke London or New York. Maybe. If I was him, I also probably would not nuke one of those two cities. But Langley in Virginia? You bet. Or maybe Quantico. Or one or two of the Amrican Nuclear bases in Europe. Not with a Tsar Bomba, mind you, just an equivalent tac nuke. Probably a clean-ish one to let the citizens know, “Hey, sorry, but if you guys don’t get rid of these pedovampires, we have to, and if you live near them and continue to support them, well… we’ll try to not nuke you with dirty bombs, but ya know, omelettes and eggshells.”
So that’s my take.
Reaction?
The one I always tell you guys. Get out of the cities, prepare as best you can to be fiat-money independent, water and food secure, security secure (guns, ammo, defences of your home and family), and build a community of co-religious people with common mindset and interests. For me it’s Sedevacantists, and only Sedevacantists, because in our brief 3 years here we have already noted that people who wanted to be part of this community but were not proper Catholics invariably flaked, gave up, or turned on us. All things I expected, but was refreshing to see happen in real terms. It’s solidified the remaining people to see things as they are and it is a unanimous perspective now among us. If you’re not a proper Catholic (the only Catholics left are Sedevacantist), we’re basically not interested in your joining us.
Catholicism has risen from the ashes time and again, and overturned heresies and situations that by all metrics should have wiped it out countless times. The reason is that Jesus promised he will be with His Church until the End Times. And that’s good enough for all of us here to have utter faith in. Our job is simply to prepare and make things as ready as we can for His return. Which, as far as I can tell from Revelation, simply means to hold on and not lose faith no matter what foul evil befalls us.
I know the people who usually link to these updates are unlikely to do so now, because I think most of them are protestant, but hey, if you think your Church from the year 1800 or even 1521, or your Novus Ordo fake “Catholicism” is going to out-perform the only Christianity that has ever existed on Earth, you go for it. Create your community of co-religionists and good luck to you.
You cannot judge the artist by the art. The art always betrays the artist. Both of these statements are true.
Which doesn’t necessarily mean he believes or agrees with it. It may have just been a discussion prompt as he asked for comments on SG.
My reply was:
No. Both statements cannot be true. It’s a basic error of logic to think so. If the art always betrays (or shall we say informs on) the artist then it provides information on him to some degree and therefore that information can absolutely be judged and therefore, by extension, so can the artist. The fact it’s not an exact science does not make it invalid.
I also added that over the years I have noticed that I tend to have a rather instinctive sense about artists, based on my reaction to their art.
It definitely refined over time, so while as a teenager I read most of Arthur C. Clarke’s SF books and a lot of Asimov’s I was left increasingly disappointed by Clarke’s work, finding it obscurely unsatisfying and unrelatable at a human level, and Asimov’s too dry to really be applicable to humanity.
Turns out Clarke was a pedophile and Asimov raised one. Which i only discovered on the last decade or two.
I never bought a book by John Scalzi or Neil Gaiman either because I read a paragraph or two of their books and had a visceral reaction of creepy nerdy vibe. I knew nothing about either man and their work was being pushed as being good at the time. I bought and never could get past the first few pages of the Mists of Avalon by Zimmer Bradley, even though I knew nothing of the abuse her and her pedophile husband had inflicted on their own daughter at the time.
I have never eead a single page of anything George R.R. Martin has written, and I never will.
There are paintings, architecture and styles of writing that give me an instant sense of disgust on some level and that I want nothing to do with.
I cannot claim any deeply conscious aspect of this. In fact I put it down to the same unconscious sense I may get from first meeting a person, when that sense is similarly negative.
With living humans in the flesh, I know it generally is an effect of thin slicing, which I think was about the only real aspect that Malcom Gladwell defined in his book Blink. His other work is really not very impressive and perhaps Blink too could have been reduced to an article length concept. The point is that I have travelled a lot, observed a lot of different people from different cultures and studied obsessively things like various philosophies, hypnosis, what little is known of the human brain and mind, done martial arts for decades and worked in life or death close protection for a number of years.
All things that will tend to expose you to many different human behaviours, and it is inevitable you develop a certain ability to spot deceptive or otherwise negative behaviour or intent.
But when it comes to art, absent the artist in the flesh, I think any ability I may have for discernment is likely tied to a sense of beauty that is, at least on some level, connected to the divine.
Beauty is one of the classical virtues, and also the most subtle, and in a way, the one closest to love. It was by noticing sunsets and flowers, on hikes, in the city, generally in life, that I first understood at an experiential level, that creation was indeed created, and not accidental, as well as that it was created both with a vast intelligence, and a loving one.
I had done the math years earlier, when still a teenager, so I knew the atheist theory was nonsensical, nevertheless, I remained essentially Zen-Agnostic for many years since, because all i could tell was that it was intelligently and apparently mostly benevolently created, but little beyond that. You can verify this if you read my The Face on Mars, where I stated that I was aware of an intelligence behind creation, even as I discussed things from an almost entirely secular scientific perspective.
In short; the art ALWAYS exposes the artist, and as such, the observer, whether consciously or not, and wether correctly or erroneously, always judges the artist.
And since on the dating/relationship/women posts I get the most emails, I think his comment is fair and points out a tendency I have to “leave out” the parts that to me are so obvious that it would be similar to typing out:
“Remember to breathe in and breathe out all day, every day, even when you are asleep.”
Even then, I will tend to get a few emails along the lines of:
“My brother did what you said while he was in the family pool and he drowned! You are evil!”
What can I say, the pain of the IQ gap is real.
Anyway, let me attempt to correct my mistake in not addressing the very basic point of HOW do you even GET to the dating part.
And let me point out a few (also obvious) things first, which I have mentioned many, many, many times before:
First of all – In today’s modern society “dating” means you’re having sex.
Second of all – Proper Catholic morality is absolutely against sex before marriage and for VERY GOOD REASONS, and I am NOT advocating against that. What I am doing is sharing concepts that got me, an unbaptised Heathen to eventually achieve a full-blown, and completely Catholic marriage (therefore Sedevacantist, because we are the only Catholics left). Since MOST people reading this are unbaptised heathens, schismatics, apostates, or various forms of heretic, and since, by Church teaching, the likelihood is you’re going to Hell anyway, for those situations, my sharing my personal concepts that got me to where I am, is not, in general terms, endangering your soul too much more than it already is, and my hope is that it gets you eventually to a place where you begin to really appreciate the Church’s perspective to the point that you decide to become a proper Catholic and reclaim your birthright, your life, your family, and your heritage, if you are of European descent, or make a new path, into it, if you are not.
Third – If you are already a believing Sedevacantist, then, your strategy for achieving marriage is, or at least should be, probably different from anything I propose here. What that might look like I have no idea, because I never walked that path. If you DID indulge in the concepts I mention here, then, your soul, according to dogmatic Church teachings would absolutely be imperilled, since you would be adding fornication before marriage to the list of whatever other sins you may be committing. So, you have been forewarned.
Fourth – The MAIN DANGER of following this advice is that you become successful (for various levels of that word) at entering into a sexual “relationship” with women. That in and of itself is indeed dangerous for many reasons. Firstly because since it may be unlikely that you very first sexual encounter goes so spectacularly well that you both reach the altar hand in hand, confess your sins of fornication and get happily married ever after, you are likely to (in time) enter into sexual congress with more than one woman. The pleasures of the flesh are among the most tempting and difficult to overcome, which is why Satan uses it to such great effect to create more and more degeneracy all around us. The danger then is that like being a junkie, you get addicted to the chase, the thrill, the sexual variety, and so on. You can end up stuck in this cycle for the rest of your life. I have met men that had literally hundreds of sexual partners (heterosexual men, that is, homosexual men are not anything I know about, but they tend to have sexual partner body counts in the thousands) who never got out of that vicious cycle. And I have met men that had only a few or even just one sexual partner, who understood more about being a man and acting as one that had no problem getting into a relationship, and hence another very Catholic marriage after their first wife had passed away. The point here is that if you engage in these concepts just to get laid, you may well be successful, but you will also lily actually end up in Hell far more likely than if you had remained the frustrated incel you may be today.
Fifth – The advice I will give you is extremely simple and direct. You will not like it, and you will likely not do it. And that is YOUR decision and your right. But you then really cannot whine any longer about being an incel. Become a monk, and do good in the world that way instead.
Alright then, here is the advice. First the ones you should already know:
Get physically as fit and good looking as you can get. Go to gym, learn basic hygiene, laser your hirsute back (or not, some girls like teddy bears), learn to dress decently, don’t get any face tattoos, eat properly, your diet, more than anything else determines your general lard-assess, and so on.
Get economically viable. Improve your job. Hustle, work harder, climb that corporate ladder even if you start out as a shelf-packer at Tesco. Money helps pretty much everything to go smoother.
Place yourself in social contexts that give you opportunity to meet desirable women. Attend your Church (yes, Sedvacantism is the ONLY real Catholicism and hence the ONLY real Christianity left, but if you attend heretic Churches, as a heretic yourself, well, one can only hope you save some unfortunate damsel from Hell when you eventually realise Catholicism is the only Christianity that ever existed), or join a book club, a tango class, a yoga class, whatever. You can’t meet women in real life if you are not physically present where they are. And yes online dating works for some of us, but the techniques to make that happen are pretty brutal, too advanced for an incel to even begin to attempt them, and not helpful at all when you are starting out. And even if you do everything right, at least 80% (and it’s becoming more like 90% and more) of men will get ZERO traction on dating apps today, and that’s not even counting the scam ones that are all fake profiles and geared to just get a bunch of lonely guys paying fees in the hope of getting a message from some “hottie”. How do I know? Because I dated a very pretty Russian girl that did that as her job. She literally was hired by this dating online firm to pretend to be interested in random guys on the app so they would keep sending fees. She was not closed off to the possibility of meeting one of these guys, but only if he ticked off all the boxes she cared about. I never paid any fees, though I did meet her on a dating app, probably because I engaged her mentally enough to respond to my message and then just went to voice call and once I got talking she got interested enough. I probably ticked off enough of her pre-conceived ideas that we did have a relationship, and she was shortly very invested in it. I liked her a lot, but did not have that mystic click I need to become fully invested, though she was undoubtedly one of the better women I got to know. My point here is that it is easier and more likely for you to get into a relationship when you are interacting face to face, so get into those situations.
Last of the obvious advices before the “secret silver bullet” is that if you live in a big city, this is a mid-point between face to face and online dating. You are far more likely to have SOMEONE that wants to engage with you sexually than in a remote village, but they are also far less likely to stick with it, because the choice is just as varied for them as it is for you. A remote village may make you an incel by geography, a large city may make you into a rootless degenerate. Pick your poison.
And now for the final reveal, the all-solution issue to getting into sexual congress with a woman. Are you ready? Sitting down? remember, I told you that you will not like it and are unlikely to do it, which are both true, but I promise you the advice is very, very real, and absolutely solid, and above all, it works.
What you need to do is…
Approach, talk to, make propositions to (from having coffee to wild sex, depending on the woman, the situation, your ability, etc etc) women all the time, while observing, and noting their responses, the types of women that respond in certain general ways and wha those various ways are, their demeanour, your own, and essentially every aspect of the interaction, but do so organically, not autistically, just TRY to get a general sense of your emotions and theirs AS you interact with them and try and experiment with different modalities of your own internal mechanism. Even if you feel fear, or shame, or anxiety, act against that, or perhaps act as if afraid when you are not. Test YOUR OWN emotional limits and push beyond them, so as to EXPAND your own emotional range of responses. Eventually what used to terrify you may make you laugh. And what used to make you laugh might be a behaviour you will not tolerate in your life and would simply walk away from. In essence, interact, observe, experiment and then correct for errors you make. That’s it. Repeat a thousand time a month and you will absolutely improve your ability with women, but also with people in general.
I can strike up a conversation with a beautiful woman on the subway that is used to rejecting hundreds of proposals a day, generally as effortlessly as I might start up a conversation with an old lady that is sitting lonely, alone in a coffee shop, and desperate for some form of human interaction. It’s like anything else, a skill. And you can only learn by DOING IT, not reading about it.
That’s it. That is all it takes.
But in the end, get thee baptised, get thee married, and make a family. And why PROPER Catholic?
Think about it:
In Catholicism the purpose of marriage is to have children and creating a family.
Divorce is dogmatically not allowed (which means you select your partner FAR more soberly if you accept this premise truly, and also it means once in it, the option of bailing does not exist, so you are forced to resolve issues together, as you would if you were castaways on an island).
Contraception is not allowed and abortion is murder. You are very likely to have a large family and while everyone on Earth will tell you what a terrible life decision that is, I can tell you that I wish my wife and I got together when we first met, as we would now have about 8 or 9 children. or maybe 8 or 9 more children. And yes we might have to live in a van down by the river, but I have never, and will never regret having children, and the more the merrier. Yes, it’s a pain that they need feeding daily and also require clothes and toys, and so on, and your time is ALL for them, but you know what? It’s awesome. Utterly awesome.
So there you have it.
And Orion, if you ever read this, feel free to get in touch, I’d sure appreciate getting a few thousand )or tens of thousand) of your subscribers become regulars on my blog or Youtube channel too. And of course, I’m offering to increase the value your subscribers may get out of life by considering my perspective.
This series is very easy to write, and apparently it translates well for readers because I have yet to receive any negative comments on it.
The blend of adventure, fantasy, handwavium SF, dark humour, sometimes gritty realism, and guns apparently resonates with the people who read the first book in the series.
Two of the readers for the first book, In the Shadow of Monte Castello, (Amazon paperback or Digital E-book) sent me the following reviews:
Addictive. The characters and plot are both entertaining yet believable. There is a very interesting mixture of gritty realism, humor, and stark horror here. I have never before encountered such a perfectly tuned blend of these elements.
Some of the dialogue and situations are laugh out loud funny, and other scenes would make it an instant classic as a film due to the humanity of the characters in it. Any GenXer who used pen and paper RPGs will also find some delightful references. I suspect Mr. Filotto had a lot of fun writing this. I can’t wait for the sequels.
One Dread Ilk reader told me that they thought this was a more immediate, brutal and realistic version of the Larry Correia Monster Hunter International type of books, which is very high praise for me, because I know Larry sells a lot of books, although I can’t comment on the accuracy of the compliment as I have not actually read any of his MHI books, just his fishing’s of various people that irritate him at his blog.
Besides, before I was banned from twitter the interactions I had with Larry were always good. I think he is a genuinely decent person.
Anyway, I hope you enjoy these two novels and if you do I am toying with the idea of creating a module for an adventure in it using the QORG RPG I created. This would be a pre-set adventure (you would still need to have the RPG game to play it) with a few pre-generated characters but also the chance to create your own characters for the module, with a referee controlling the game. I doubt there is enough appeal for it, so it’s a doubtful proposition, nevertheless, I’d be happy to be surprised.
Loading ...
On Art
Vox posted this on his blog:
Which doesn’t necessarily mean he believes or agrees with it. It may have just been a discussion prompt as he asked for comments on SG.
My reply was:
I also added that over the years I have noticed that I tend to have a rather instinctive sense about artists, based on my reaction to their art.
It definitely refined over time, so while as a teenager I read most of Arthur C. Clarke’s SF books and a lot of Asimov’s I was left increasingly disappointed by Clarke’s work, finding it obscurely unsatisfying and unrelatable at a human level, and Asimov’s too dry to really be applicable to humanity.
Turns out Clarke was a pedophile and Asimov raised one. Which i only discovered on the last decade or two.
I never bought a book by John Scalzi or Neil Gaiman either because I read a paragraph or two of their books and had a visceral reaction of creepy nerdy vibe. I knew nothing about either man and their work was being pushed as being good at the time. I bought and never could get past the first few pages of the Mists of Avalon by Zimmer Bradley, even though I knew nothing of the abuse her and her pedophile husband had inflicted on their own daughter at the time.
I have never eead a single page of anything George R.R. Martin has written, and I never will.
There are paintings, architecture and styles of writing that give me an instant sense of disgust on some level and that I want nothing to do with.
I cannot claim any deeply conscious aspect of this. In fact I put it down to the same unconscious sense I may get from first meeting a person, when that sense is similarly negative.
With living humans in the flesh, I know it generally is an effect of thin slicing, which I think was about the only real aspect that Malcom Gladwell defined in his book Blink. His other work is really not very impressive and perhaps Blink too could have been reduced to an article length concept. The point is that I have travelled a lot, observed a lot of different people from different cultures and studied obsessively things like various philosophies, hypnosis, what little is known of the human brain and mind, done martial arts for decades and worked in life or death close protection for a number of years.
All things that will tend to expose you to many different human behaviours, and it is inevitable you develop a certain ability to spot deceptive or otherwise negative behaviour or intent.
But when it comes to art, absent the artist in the flesh, I think any ability I may have for discernment is likely tied to a sense of beauty that is, at least on some level, connected to the divine.
Beauty is one of the classical virtues, and also the most subtle, and in a way, the one closest to love. It was by noticing sunsets and flowers, on hikes, in the city, generally in life, that I first understood at an experiential level, that creation was indeed created, and not accidental, as well as that it was created both with a vast intelligence, and a loving one.
I had done the math years earlier, when still a teenager, so I knew the atheist theory was nonsensical, nevertheless, I remained essentially Zen-Agnostic for many years since, because all i could tell was that it was intelligently and apparently mostly benevolently created, but little beyond that. You can verify this if you read my The Face on Mars, where I stated that I was aware of an intelligence behind creation, even as I discussed things from an almost entirely secular scientific perspective.
In short; the art ALWAYS exposes the artist, and as such, the observer, whether consciously or not, and wether correctly or erroneously, always judges the artist.
Which is as it should be.
No related posts.
By G | 16 August 2024 | Posted in Social Commentary